Posts Tagged ‘foursquare’

Why ‘Checking-in’ needs to be about People, not Places

Image taken from: http://www.knowyourcell.com/features/568563/when_it_comes_to_checkins_ive_checked_out.html

Image taken from: http://www.knowyourcell.com/features/568563/when_it_comes_to_checkins_ive_checked_out.html

It looks like there’s a new player in the game in the world of mobile location-based services, Uberlife. ‘Great, so what?’ is the first thing that might pop into your mind. These types of services have now been around for years and amidst the jungle of existing applications such as Foursquare, Gowalla, Facebook Places, or SCVNGR, why should this one suddenly be worth talking about?

The truth is, the ever-evolving fleet of location-based services have been largely constrained by the simple fact that most only let you share where you currently are, which is of limited value to users. Think about it, once you’ve checked in to a place, there is often no longer any opportunity for others to come and meet you, all that’s left to do is for them to ‘like’ it or add a comment. For being a form of social media, the often obnoxious element of ‘hey, look where I am, and you’re not’ has a decidedly anti-social touch to it.

This is exactly where the London-based startup Uberlife comes into play, by offering a refreshing twist. Whilst their iPhone and Web app is built on a similar real-life, location-based framework as existing services, it’s more than just the basic check-in. The key differentiating factor is that you’re now broadcasting where you intend to be in the future, creating new events on the go and inviting your friends to ‘hang out’ in advance. These ‘hangouts’, which can be a quick beer after work, a spontaneous cinema trip, a last-minute coffee run or simply chilling in the park, can be followed on the network by your friends. They are able to check-in, add comments, and share images of the meet-up to create a nice little memorabilia of the event.

One might argue that there are of course existing mechanisms already in place that facilitate getting together, such as over Twitter and Facebook, but more often than not these go under in the fast paced way of life or are quite simply far too formal. Uberlife recognizes that meeting up with friends these days involves a great degree of pre-organization and frustrating messaging back and forth until a plan eventually comes together. In comparison, the app presents us with a spontaneous, simple and mobile means to bring people together that taps into and integrates seamlessly in today’s ‘on-the-go’ lifestyle.

Critically, this manages to address a fundamental need. After all, what use is a check-in if it can’t be spent and shared with friends? As opposed to sharing where you’ve checked in to, you’re now sharing plans about where you and your friends can check-in together. It aims to bridge the gap between the often remote nature of supposedly ‘social’ media platforms and actual real life socializing.

This clearly is far more relevant and interesting to not only users but also businesses and brands who may be willing to experiment with location-based campaigns and programs focusing on check-in rewards. From a business perspective, wouldn’t it make far more sense to send out offers to those intending to be at a certain place at a certain time, rather than once they’ve announced that they’re there? If businesses are aware of what you are intending to do and where you’ll be, relevant offers and promotions can be generated and implemented far more strategically.

Keeping in mind what Starbucks cleverly did with Foursquare and its Mayor specials, the future check-in could offer exciting opportunities for experimenting with novel ways of communicating with consumers. After all, surely businesses would be much more interested in the prospect of a group of people intending to show up, rather than simply knocking $1 off a Frappuccino to the single person that ends up being the Foursquare Mayor.

The real question remaining of course is whether or not these apps are actually able to generate business value, where one of the biggest hurdles to establishing themselves as valuable tools for businesses in the past, has been encouraging people to actually opt-in to geolocation. What is of foremost importance to avoid being another unclicked icon on the iPhone, is how engaging a service is and what value it provides users with. So far, in lacking a fundamental social element and raising the question of ‘so how do these services actually help you?’, the basic ‘check-in’ has failed deliver what can be seen as genuine ‘value’ or reward for users sharing their locations.

Another app that is looking to inject a more social element into the field is last years’ start-up We&Co, that has aimed to leverage the power of a simple ‘thank-you’. The iPhone app is designed to allow users to thank service professionals, like their favourite barista, hair stylist or bartender at places they visit. The focus is therefore no longer on solely the place through the check-in, but on the people, adding a distinctive human element to the service. Employees can respond to the thank you and encourage you to drop by again, where businesses can choose to offer discounts or freebies as incentives to regular and the most gracious thank-you’ers, creating further ways of connecting meaningfully with their customers.

When a quantifiable metric can be attached to positive encounters between a brand and its customers, this acts as direct reinforcement for employees to provide an even better service and for consumers to continue to proactively share their appreciation. In today’s cynical consumer environment, a positive reinforcement cycle that is built around enjoyable exchanges beyond simply places or prices, allows deeper connections and enduring relationships to be formed between businesses and their customers.

The overarching theme that is therefore becoming clear for the successful evolution of location-based services is the crucial need for them to incorporate a genuinely social component into the mix. It is only once you start looking beyond the limitations of the standard ‘check-in’ that these services could really play an intriguing and influential role in creating compelling and relevant consumer engagements through and with the smart phone. More crucially, it opens up the unique opportunity for technology to enable us to actually be truly social again.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

23

01 2012

Social Media Efforts: What’s the Point for the Big Ones?

header21 Social Media Efforts: Whats the Point for the Big Ones?

It seems like every company nowadays has taken use of a social media platform where they can connect with their customers. Even the local dentist around the corner from where I live has a Facebook page you can like! And it is fully understandable if you think about the opportunities related to this type of marketing; it’s minimal of costs involved (compared to traditional media), you can build and support your business’ image through the way you communicate, it’s an opportunity to create a dialogue with your customers compared to the traditional you-listen-to-me-now-monologue. Even if the dentist so far has only gotten 20 likes, it’s a start and for small businesses it’s important to be visible in order to generate new customers, and to even keep the old ones.

But if we look at the other end of the scale, the companies topping the Fortune Global 500; why should they bother with all this social media stuff when in reality the people they reach out to in this way is only a per mille of their whole customer base. Take McDonald’s for example, they have 64 million customers in their stores everyday, and when multiplied into customers per year… Well, with that secure flow of people buying their burgers why should they even care about their 10 million+ fans on Facebook?

And then we have Walmart; the ruler of the corporate world in terms of generated revenue, landing the top spot of the Fortune Global 500 for the second year in a row. When talking about such extraterrestrial numbers as Walmart’s revenue, can it therefore be that the resources they put into maintaining their social media channels in fact equals what they potentially will earn on the additional sales coming from their marketing efforts in these channels? When you think about it, they are already getting their (piece of the) pie in the areas where they’re in, so percentage-wise it can’t really be significant can it?

I read an article the other day and one of the comments left from one of the readers shared this point of view. The article was about Walmart’s Foursquare check-ins showing that they had a total of 149,000 check-ins in the Thanksgiving week and approximately 35,000 of those came from the US’ busiest shopping day the Black Friday. In the comment the guy stated that

If every single one of the ~35,000 people who checked in at Walmart on Black Friday spent an extra $10 because of this check-in. (…) That would equate to an extra $350,000 of revenue for Walmart. For comparison, Walmart’s total annual sales number is over $400 BILLION. The impact of Foursquare would boost its sales by a whopping .0001%.”

I guess he has a point, and it almost seems like the big ones can even save money on cutting back on their social media involvement, so why shouldn’t they?

I would say a definite no, they should not. It’s not all about the money (yes, of course in the end it is, but bear with me) it’s also about securing the future sales. Having a platform where you can communicate, for better or for worse, is crucial. The communication will take place, you being a part of it or not. And no company would like to live through the scenario of BP’s Gulf of Mexico nightmare or the release of the two Domino’s Pizza workers’ Youtube video, not at any rate, but at least not without having a megaphone to use for damage control! So if you are my local dentist, McDonald’s, Walmart or anyone in between I see without a doubt more pros than cons for keeping that social media activity up.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

09

12 2011

The Power of “Thank you”: There’s an app for that

Leveraging the Foursquare API, We First, a company that calls itself “Social Branding Consulting Firm” released an app for the iPhone that allows people to thank service staff found at the places where, previously, you would have just checked in. The idea is very simple and I find it very interesting. Sure, you can just actually say “Thank you!” but for service professionals it’s probably nice to have something “on record.” In fact, it could help employers incentivize their staff. A virtual “Employee of the month” program, if you will.

shot1 The Power of Thank you: Theres an app for that

It begs the question: can it ultimately change how customer service improves? I think it potentially could. Making Thank Yous social may lead to new behaviors, similar to existing recommendation apps, but adding a more human element to the whole thing. After all, when we recommend a venue, do we just recommend, say the food, or also the service? I suppose many times in fact we recommend the service and friendliness and atmosphere created by employees more than the food.

After years of digital technologies just enabling people to be more and more in control of their purchase decisions (before and after), essentially arming them for the conflict and battle with a service or sales person, this kind of idea could create a platform for human interactions that is about valuing experiences, and creating incentives for those whose job it is to create those experiences for customers.

Check it out here.

On another note:Kudos to a firm that calls itself “consulting firm” to actually create a real experience for the social space, as opposed to just analyzing and talking about the social space.

Via Jake Setlak

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark

27

07 2011

Location-Based Services and the Marketers that don’t Love Them (Yet)

I had just read this article about marketers not sure how to take advantage of Location-Based Services, specifically ones that are Social-Network based, and one of our Account people popped their head in my office to ask “What’s up with FourSquare? Is it worthwhile? And is it significant for Marketers?”

Good questions all. Foursquare allows you to “check in” to locations and awards badges for different user activities. The Article correctly states that some restaurants and bars are already embracing it, but the activities and offers are still in early days. Note the offer from Wow Bao in my building below:

 Location-Based Services and the Marketers that don’t Love Them (Yet)

Yeah – it’s a freebie offer, but I find it interesting that there is such a conversation about “is this interesting for marketers” and “how will marketers use it” – since it should make sense to pay attention to if you’ve got at least some of your audience that uses these kinds of things, and you’re worth having a relationship with in the first place (which, granted, is a big question for some marketers).

Here’s why: think about why restaurants and bars already jumped on the bandwagon. They have to develop relationships with their customers – they don’t have a choice. They don’t have a retailer that will put up POS material, or vast amounts of online ad spend (generally), and most of the places I’ve seen don’t do TV. For them, the relationship with the person in that establishment is everything, and finding new ways to prolong and enrich that relationship is the key to their success. For them the only question would be “why would I not get involved?”

Now I’m looking back over the last 12 months and thinking about the times I’ve mentioned doing something like this for a marketer, and thinking “You know what? My Client needs to break out from the shelf, their target is pretty well-connected digitally, they are not always getting the POS attention they want, or always deserve, they want more engagement, and since their relationship with the consumer is everything for them as well … so Why not?”

Bonus topic for further conversation: How different would the strategy for the marketer be from what they use for Facebook and Twitter?

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share/Save/Bookmark