We are often asked whether or not a Global Brand should have just one presence on Global social media platforms. For instance, should there just be one Facebook page for your company?
Facebook prefers to have global brands only have one presence, and says that multiple presences fracture brands, and there are clear benefits to having one central presence -
- Larger numbers of fan/followers and comments – which can showcase the popularity, breadth and power of global brands
- Brand Temperature - a place where the ‘Global Pulse’ of the brand can be felt
- Consistent messaging – which is more easily centrally managed
- Efficiency and scale – in that fewer, more central teams are required for development and management of assets – which can allow smaller markets to get cheaper access to better content than if they had to create it just for their market.
And bear in mind that local promotions and communications can still be done, using market-based status updates and custom tabs that allow for users to select their market and get local content – making the page “Glocal”.
Many brands, however do not choose to implement a global page, but instead (or IN ADDITION TO) use local or market-restricted pages due to complexities like
- Operations - the challenge of planning and executing across markets can be one of the biggest hurdles companies face in creation and management of global platforms, due to the organization needed to corral Brand managers across markets into a unified strategy and editorial calendar. Along with a strong central agency, some specialist partners can help with planning and implementation.
- Moderation – who will remove offensive posts and users who abuse the page or page visitors? Moderation guidelines must be set centrally, but we recommend use of local or regionalized community management to ensure that fluent language speakers can catch nuance and hidden needs.
- Escalation – the community management action is generally well equipped to handle escalation, but many markets do not have a Consumer Affairs group ready to be the recipients of complaints or issues from this new channel.
- Legal/policy restrictions – legal variances exist for how companies must treat User Generated Content, and these policies and restrictions are still an emerging area for legal – standards are not fixed yet.
- Product availability – users may be upset when made aware of variances in products by market. If you have starkly differentiated product lines (Diet Coke versus Coke) or consumer segments (your product fans versus your F1 team fans, moms versus kids), a unified presence may not make sense.
- Relevant content - Good old-fashioned local relevance can be a big factor. Including language concerns, and if local promotions are a large focus of the page, you may still have some markets not served by global promotions, which can create unhappy users. Again, a custom tab can help in this case.
Starbucks, for example, has a global site, but offers redirects to international local sites for increased relevance. Adidas offers a local customization page on their global page, but you can also find Adidas Running, Basketball, and other specialty sites as well. The oft-discussed Coke maintains one main, fan-powered site, and local market sites do not appear to take advantage of any centrally built applications.
Twitter also presents challenges since localization depends on users turning on location settings or a full profile - a rarity on that platform. But that will be covered in another post!
Tweet This Post